| 31 | | '''Present:''' |
| | 31 | '''Present:''' KL, HTL, JPa, CH, OE, GB, JPo, VB |
| | 32 | |
| | 33 | 1. __Introduction and status of preparation of 'reference' proposal: **//KL//**__ |
| | 34 | * Goals for the meeting: |
| | 35 | * [raw-attachment:2018-10-30.pptx Discuss and agree parameter table to allow revision of design of in-vitro facility]; |
| | 36 | * Noted that 10MeV places Bragg peak before cells and 15MeV places Bragg peak in the nutrient solution. |
| | 37 | * Questions: |
| | 38 | * (JPo) How many particles are need to get 10G into cell layer. Need to integrate dose for particular energy beams over cell layer. |
| | 39 | * (JPo) What energy spread assumed by Ajit? We thought it as assumed to be 1%--2%. Need to distinguish energy spread from straggling compared to beam line |
| | 40 | * //** We agreed to accept 15MeV as baseline for maximum energy.**// |
| | 41 | * Discuss and agree skeleton for the LARA CDR document. |
| | 42 | 1. __Parameter table for discussion: Provocation: **//KL//**; discussion **//All//**__ |
| | 43 | * Outline table contained in slide 3 discussed. We found the need to add two sections: specification and instrumentation/control. |
| | 44 | 1. __LARA CDR skeleton: Provocation: **//KL//**; discussion **//All//**__ |
| | 45 | * **KL** will produce skeleton in OverLeaf. |
| | 46 | 1. __Next steps: **//All//**__ |
| | 47 | * //**Agree:**// make a pass to produce a first version of the parameter table for the next meeting. Then discuss how to make a plan to complete the simultions required to complete the conceptual design and assign sections for the CDR. |
| | 48 | 1. __AoB__ |
| | 49 | * None. |
