19 | | * |
| 19 | * 1.1 Scientific case (JP, YP) |
| 20 | * 1.2 Technological advancement (TG) |
| 21 | * 1.3 Impact \\ |
| 22 | One of the leads left Imperial. Agreed this section would be drafted by KL and PP and circulated for comment. |
| 23 | * 2.4 Timeline for the LhARA initiative: \\ |
| 24 | KL has reached out to one of the lead authors. We agreed that this section would be drafted in collaboration by KL and PP |
| 25 | * 4. Conclusions (AG, KL) \\ |
| 26 | We agreed to add the following sections: |
| 27 | * Ethics |
| 28 | * Sustainability |
| 29 | We discussed the timeline for completion of the document: |
| 30 | * Completed text: 08Apr22 |
| 31 | * Circulate to collaboration for comment with 1 week deadline; |
| 32 | * Finalised document by 22Apr22 -- gives 1 week contingency before collaboration meeting \\ |
| 33 | We agreed to: |
| 34 | * Propose this time table to the WPMs at next Tuesday's meeting; |
| 35 | * Then advertise to the collaboration; |
| 36 | * KL will keep M. Lamont Chair of the CCAP IAB appraised of the developments |