Context Navigation

Scratch

v9	v10
42	42	CW was indisposed so KL summarised the status of preparation of the proposal in slides 6 to 12. In general there was good progress and the WPMs were to be congratulated for the significant efforts. The end station/instrumentation development w/p (WP5) needed further discussion for specification and the ion-acoustic dose-mapping activity needed to be documented.
43	43	* Stakeholders’ plan development: JPar \\
44		See [raw-attachment: slides]
	44	See [raw-attachment:Lharas-takeholder-meeting-notes-290921.pdf slides]
45	45	* JC commented on the status of the consideration of the ITRF proposal: The UKRI IAC had met and had made its recommendations to UKRI. The Research Council Executive Chairs were now being consulted to ask for their input on the strategic fit of the proposal to their council's programme. If this yields sufficient support, the next step will be to see whether there is sufficient money to support the Preliminary Phase activity. JC reported that DL is planning for success and preparing to go ahead. He noted that the ITRF was a bigger piece of work than LhARA alone. He also commented that STFC had been briefed and was asking questions about the medical accelerator initiative.
46	46