Changes between Version 5 and Version 6 of Research/GaborLens/Meetings/2020/09/10


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Sep 11, 2020, 8:04:39 AM (4 years ago)
Author:
td1719
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Research/GaborLens/Meetings/2020/09/10

    v5 v6  
    55== Summary of actions ==
    66 * **KL** Get CW a wiki account.
     7 * **HT** To prepare slides for Martin King – ready for review next week
     8 * **TD** To find paper cited in ERC proposal on tape drive post on Wiki with relevant referenced papers.
    79
     10 
    811== Notes ==
    9 3D sim – supports claim than proton energy is x2 smaller in 3D than in 2D
     123. //[raw-attachment:meeting_HTL_100920.pdf Updates on the particle generation]//: **HT**
    1013
    11 Note:
     14  * 3D sim – supports claim than proton energy is x2 smaller in 3D than in 2D
     15  * sim – not necessarily convergent
     16  * cut at 15um removes high energy particles – as a result online graphs are not representative
    1217
    13 · sim – not necessarily convergent
     184. //[raw-attachment:LhARA_Capture_10Sep20_TSD.pdf​ Updates on simulation of "IC" lens]//: **TSD**
    1419
    15 · cut at 15um removes high energy particles – as a result online graphs are not representative
    16 
    17 ·
    18 
    19 Action on HT to prepare slides for Martin King – ready for review next week
    20 
    21 Action on TD to find paper cited in ERC proposal on tape drive post on Wiki with relevent referenced papers.
    22 
    23 TD
    24 
    25 · Hollow plasma column
    26 
    27 o 4 fold structure caused by holes in anode?
    28 
    29 o Sim with no holes still 4 fold- cartesian
    30 
    31 § TD will look at electromagnetic solve
    32 
    33 § CW to interface w. David Speirs
    34 
    35 o electrons lost, mostly on central electrode
    36 
    37 o Beam propagation into plasma – results look as expected.
     20  * Hollow plasma column - 4 fold structure caused by holes in anode?
     21  * Sim with no holes still 4 fold- cartesian
     22  * Will look at the electromagnetic solver (CW to interface w. David Speirs)
     23  * electrons lost, mostly on central electrode
     24  * Beam propagation into plasma – results look as expected.
    3825----
    3926