Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of Research/DesignStudy/Meetings/2018-08-01-ERC


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Dec 11, 2018 5:36:36 PM (5 years ago)
Author:
longkr
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Research/DesignStudy/Meetings/2018-08-01-ERC

    v1 v2  
    1 = test =
     1= ERC proposal Meeting 31st July 2018 =
     2
     3== Meeting details ==
     4
     514:00 Room 532
     6
     7Phone details:
     8{{{
     9UK: 08082 380274
     10Austria: 0800 006612
     11
     12PIN: 5904750902
     13}}}
     14
     15== Agenda: ==
     16
     17 * Informal presentations:
     18  * [raw-attachment:2018-07-31-BioWP.pptx End station]
     19  * [raw-attachment:B2-summary-slide.pptx Laser source]
     20  * Capture
     21  * [raw-attachment:2018-07-31-Beamline-Simulation.pptx Transport and delivery]; [raw-attachment:Pasternak.pdf transport design]
     22  * [raw-attachment:20180801-DiagCont.pdf​ Diagnostics]
     23  * Software and performance evaluation
     24
     25== Notes: ==
     26
     27'''Present:''' RT, LM, JPa, AK, KL, CH, VB, DC
     28
     29 * Informal presentations:
     30  * Endstation:
     31   * Need to compare measurements with novel source to 'gold standard' photon source;
     32   * Also need to compare novel source to beam generated at !MedAustron and other standard hardon soures;
     33   * Principal issue identified is that 5.6MeV protons do not penetrate a sufficient depth of water/medium/plastic;
     34   * SG is making an attempt to grow cells on a membrane as a route to mitigating the problem;
     35   * JPa has a solution for energies up to (perhaps) 11MeV.  Clearly there is a critical interface from surface of vacuum window in biological end-station to cell layer.  Proposal needs to identify this interface, not risk that we don't solve it, and dedicate effort to resolving the issue.