40 | | 1. __Progress; comparison to schedule: **//AK//**__ |
| 40 | * None. |
| 41 | 1. __Progress; comparison to schedule: **//AK//**__\\ |
| 42 | //SciWire: |
| 43 | * Machining of winding rig nearly finished. About 3 weeks behind original (optimistic) schedule but still should be completed by end of March. |
| 44 | //Gabor lens: |
| 45 | * Hold up is rad safety paperwork |
| 46 | * Direct comparison with Toby will be done soon. |
| 47 | * Measurements to locate hot spots will take a couple of days, so all tests should be done in a week. |
| 48 | * Tests with the radiation source should take about 2 weeks. |
| 49 | //CDR: |
| 50 | * OE simulation at 15MeV was run, will analyse soon. |
| 51 | * JPo input file for space charge will then use input from OE's simulation. Will then update with final lattice from JPa. |
| 52 | * JPa updated lattice described in SoI: 2 Gabor lenses collimation, 2 lenses then bending. Stage 2 has switching dipole with horizontal injection into FFA (horizontal or vertical FFA). |
| 53 | * HT: Not heard anything about writing something on the end station. |
| 54 | |
| 80 | * OE: Need to emphasise why you want to use the laser, it is inherently risky and should say why you cannot do this with a conventional source. |
| 81 | * JPa: Need to say same front-end to deliver high doses and multiple ions. |
| 82 | * AK: Can same target for protons deliver high dose carbon? |
| 83 | * OE: same target can deliver high dose carbon. In future think about moving to gaseous targets (e.g. methane) or pure carbon foils. There are options to improve carbon yields from the standard thin foil targets. |
| 84 | * OE: Need to be careful about saying this is novel, Germans (Dresden) have been doing this. Have done 10-15 MeV cell irradiation with solenoid capture. Should say Gabor lens is unique but need to show why this capture is better. |
| 85 | * JPo: Much more cost effective focussing. |
| 86 | * JPo: can say Dresden is not a facility (but proved the principle). We should say we want a dedicated facility. |
| 87 | * OE: Laser system will be large (not compact). In the future may get more compact systems only if there is commercial interest. |
| 88 | * RBE experiments at other facilities done in parallel with other R&D not a dedicated facility. |
| 89 | * JPo: Will write a paragraph on advantages of the Gabor lens. Should mention instantaneous current is much higher (good for Ultra High Dose Rate therapy). |
| 90 | * JPa: Need to make the following clear: |
| 91 | * Why use an FFA, will deliver multiple species over broad energy range. |
| 92 | * What respect this facility is novel wrt to other sources. |
| 93 | * Why LARA will do RBE experiments better. |
| 94 | * Need to state risks with the laser. |
| 95 | * OE: shouldn't mention risks but should be aware. |
| 96 | * AK: mention diagnostics and how this can be used to characterise the beam (i.e. correct for variations in the laser-driven ion beam). Cite other studies to put LARA into context. |