| 54 | | Participants: \\ |
| 55 | | Apologies: |
| | 54 | Participants: AK, HTL, WS, KL, JM, GA, SGre, CW\\ |
| | 55 | Apologies: JPas |
| | 56 | |
| | 57 | * Action items |
| | 58 | * JPas to send AK beta and alpha as a function of S (calculated by BeamOptics). |
| | 59 | * Stands. |
| | 60 | * System updates |
| | 61 | * Capture |
| | 62 | * CW: Will try to arrange meeting with Juergen. |
| | 63 | * KL: Student will be done with lectures soon and can then start working on this. |
| | 64 | * AK: arrange phone call with Colin, etc. |
| | 65 | * Beam transport. |
| | 66 | * Stage 1 simulations see plots. |
| | 67 | * HTL: New solution for the transfer line to the in vivo end station. Can provide 1-3cm and down to 1mm. |
| | 68 | * Infrastructure and integration |
| | 69 | * Slides from SGre. |
| | 70 | * Costing. |
| | 71 | * No running costs. |
| | 72 | * Installation and commissioning costs should be included. |
| | 73 | * Schedule should not include running time for stage 2. |
| | 74 | * Instrumentation. |
| | 75 | * AK and JM met on Friday to discuss what instrumentation requirements are and what should go into the pre-CDR. |
| | 76 | * AOB |
| | 77 | * Review. |
| | 78 | * Date of the review is the 31st March. |
| | 79 | * Additional date to be fixed for JPar and Yolanda. |
