| 4 | | * [https://ccap.hep.ph.ic.ac.uk/trac/raw-attachment/wiki/Research/DesignStudy/PreCDR/Review/2020-03-31-LhARA_pre_CDR-d2.0.pdf Present version of the draft pre-CDR] |
| 5 | | * [https://ccap.hep.ph.ic.ac.uk/trac/wiki/Research/DesignStudy/PreCDR/Review Material prepared for or presented at the pre-publication review of the pre-CDR] |
| 6 | | * This page also contains links to the reviewers' evaluation. For ease of access the relevant files are linked once more here: |
| 7 | | * [https://ccap.hep.ph.ic.ac.uk/trac/raw-attachment/wiki/Research/DesignStudy/PreCDR/Review/2020-04-10-LhARA-review-summary.pdf Draft evaluation from the panel] |
| 8 | | * [https://ccap.hep.ph.ic.ac.uk/trac/raw-attachment/wiki/Research/DesignStudy/PreCDR/Review/2020-03-27-review.CDR.YP.pdf Y.Prezado's letter] evaluating the radiobiological aspects of the programme based on the draft pre-CDR and the 25^th^ March 2020 review meeting; |
| 9 | | * [https://ccap.hep.ph.ic.ac.uk/trac/raw-attachment/wiki/Research/DesignStudy/PreCDR/Review/Lhara-Pre-CDR-Review-input-from-Bolton-03-04-20.pdf P.Bolton's] evaluation of the programme based on the draft pre-CDR and the material prepared for the review meetings on the 25^th^ and 31^st^ March 2020. |
| | 4 | [https://ccap.hep.ph.ic.ac.uk/trac/raw-attachment/wiki/Research/DesignStudy/PreCDR/Review/2020-03-31-LhARA_pre_CDR-d2.0.pdf Present version of the draft pre-CDR] |
| | 5 | |
| | 6 | == Pre-publication review of the draft pre-CDR by an international expert panel == |
| | 7 | [https://ccap.hep.ph.ic.ac.uk/trac/wiki/Research/DesignStudy/PreCDR/Review Material prepared for or presented at the pre-publication review of the pre-CDR] |
| | 8 | * This page also contains links to the reviewers' evaluation. For ease of access the relevant files are linked once more here: |
| | 9 | * [https://ccap.hep.ph.ic.ac.uk/trac/raw-attachment/wiki/Research/DesignStudy/PreCDR/Review/2020-04-10-LhARA-review-summary.pdf Draft evaluation from the panel] |
| | 10 | * [https://ccap.hep.ph.ic.ac.uk/trac/raw-attachment/wiki/Research/DesignStudy/PreCDR/Review/2020-03-27-review.CDR.YP.pdf Y.Prezado's letter] evaluating the radiobiological aspects of the programme based on the draft pre-CDR and the 25^th^ March 2020 review meeting; |
| | 11 | * [https://ccap.hep.ph.ic.ac.uk/trac/raw-attachment/wiki/Research/DesignStudy/PreCDR/Review/Lhara-Pre-CDR-Review-input-from-Bolton-03-04-20.pdf P.Bolton's] evaluation of the programme based on the draft pre-CDR and the material prepared for the review meetings on the 25^th^ and 31^st^ March 2020. |
| | 12 | |
| | 13 | == Skeleton publication == |
| | 14 | [https://ccap.hep.ph.ic.ac.uk/trac/attachment/wiki/Research/DesignStudy/PreCDR/2020-04-02-LhARA-preCDR-frontiers-d0.0.pdf Draft 0.0]: skeleton of the publication |
| | 15 | |
| | 16 | == Request == |
| | 17 | The LhARA team believes that it is valuable for a lay summary to be included in both the pre-CDR and the publication that is now being prepared based on the draft pre-CDR. The request therefore is that a lay summary be prepared for each. |
| | 18 | |
| | 19 | There is no word/page limit for the Lay Summary to be included in the pre-CDR. For the publication, the journal has a 350 word limit on the article's abstract. We therefore propose a 350-word limit on the lay summary to be included in the publication. |
| | 20 | |
| | 21 | The journal requires that we submit the article by the 30^th^ April 2020, so there is a deadline for the 350-word Lay Summary for the publication. The pre-CDR will be "published" as a CCAP Technical Note and so we are able to re-issue the pre-CDR as required. This makes it possible to consider different timescales for the Lay Summary included in the pre-CDR and that for the publication. |
| | 22 | |
| | 23 | == Links to further information == |
| | 24 | For completeness I include [https://ccap.hep.ph.ic.ac.uk/trac/wiki/Research/DesignStudy/PreCDR here] the link to the wiki page used by the LhARA team to share information in the preparation of the pre-CDR. |
