| 3 | | Test |
| | 3 | WP2 – ND & KL, CW, DK |
| | 4 | |
| | 5 | The sub-team has weekly meetings. They have made a good progress with the costing and have started a risk registry. |
| | 6 | |
| | 7 | ND presented slides. Proposing to split the WP into 2 main themes: source demonstration/characterisation – lower risk / R7D for full , stable, sustainable 10 Hz operation – higher risk. |
| | 8 | [[span(style=color: #FF1000, KL- suggested to tackle the higher risk first. )]] |
| | 9 | |
| | 10 | |
| | 11 | Milestones have been identified: |
| | 12 | |
| | 13 | * MS1 Full 3D + hydro baseline simulations using optimised SCAPA-like conditions |
| | 14 | * MS2 – Deliver a diagnostic platform for proton and heavy ion beam characterisation |
| | 15 | * MS3- perform baseline experiment for proton and carbon beams at 1 Hz using optimised conditions on SCAPA. |
| | 16 | * MS4- conceptual design of sustainable target system complete |
| | 17 | * MS5 completed concept design on ion source system |
| | 18 | * MS6 continuous operation of ion source demonstrated |
| | 19 | Costing: It should be the Full Economic Cost . Capital costs will be organised through STFC. |
| | 20 | Measurements in collaboration with Belfast. Belfast should be recognised. |
| | 21 | [[span(style=color: #FF0000, KL suggested to add cost for people in Belfast as well as equipment cost. Maybe the additional cost for a student at Belfast? )]] |
| | 22 | [[span(style=color: #FF0000, CW suggested to not underestimate Elisabetta's time on the costing sheet.)]] |
| | 23 | |
| | 24 | Action ND: to talk to people in Belfast wrt adding staff costing and studentship. |
| | 25 | Action ND: to send an updated costing sheet and the risk registry. - Done |
