1 | Reviewer 1; notes and actions KL; 10Jul20 |
---|
2 | ============================= |
---|
3 | |
---|
4 | Notes from review: |
---|
5 | ------------------ |
---|
6 | 1. As suggested by review 2; need to compress and make more robust. JPar |
---|
7 | 2. PUSH back; detail is required for critical reading and to allow KL |
---|
8 | interested experts to validate our claims. |
---|
9 | 3. OK; we can answer some of these questions; some questions we can KL |
---|
10 | not answer. |
---|
11 | 4. OK; the answer is cost and efficiency. Need to make more clear CW |
---|
12 | the reasons wht we have chosen the Gabor lens and that the |
---|
13 | solenoid fall-back froms at a price. |
---|
14 | 5. Yes, this is a good point. We need to address it as it helps KL |
---|
15 | hone our message. Indeed, LhARA is a proof of principle for |
---|
16 | technologies that can be developed for the clinic. Need to |
---|
17 | update text and respond in cover letter. |
---|
18 | 6. Should we add comments in the motivation? JPar |
---|
19 | Also, justify from patients point of view. |
---|
20 | 7. Hmm -- OK, lets re-adjust this. KL |
---|
21 | 8. Address by making revisions required and arguing that the KL |
---|
22 | article is a consistent whole in the cover letter. |
---|
23 | 9. Repeat of 1. JPar |
---|
24 | 10. OK. TSD |
---|
25 | 11. Consider in revision. JPar |
---|
26 | 12. Consider in revision. JPar |
---|
27 | 13. Consider in revision. KL |
---|
28 | 14. OK, check and implement! TSD |
---|
29 | 15. Consider in revision. KL |
---|
30 | 16. Consider in revision. KL |
---|
31 | 17. Minor text revision. WS/JPa |
---|
32 | 18. Push back in cover letter. KL |
---|
33 | 19. Consider in revision. KL |
---|
34 | 20. Consider in revision. KL |
---|
35 | 21. Agreed. Small txt update. KL |
---|
36 | 22. Consider in revision. JPar/KL |
---|
37 | 23. Consider in revision. JPar/KL |
---|
38 | |
---|
39 | Notes from "comments": |
---|
40 | ---------------------- |
---|
41 | 1. As in 1. above; revise text. JPar |
---|
42 | 2. Respond in cover letter; some changes in txt will be referre to. KL |
---|
43 | 3. Actions noted in 11 above, add comment in cover letter. KL |
---|
44 | |
---|
45 | -------- -------- // -------- -------- |
---|
46 | |
---|
47 | Reviewer 2; notes and actions KL; 10Jul20 |
---|
48 | ============================= |
---|
49 | |
---|
50 | Notes from review: |
---|
51 | ------------------ |
---|
52 | 1. Need reference to timescales in response. JPar/KL |
---|
53 | Revise text/references. |
---|
54 | 2. As in Reviewer1, 1. Update text. JPar |
---|
55 | 3. As in Reviewer1, 1. Update text. JPar |
---|
56 | 4. Explain space-charge limit; short text JPa |
---|
57 | 5. Reference (perhaps text revision?) OE |
---|
58 | 6. Fix in caption WS |
---|
59 | 7. Agreed; revise sentence and provide reference. OE |
---|
60 | 8. Discuss: do we need a plot? Add reference at least. OE |
---|
61 | 9. Add sentence to explain. CW |
---|
62 | 10. Potential repetition; consider revision. OE/KL |
---|
63 | 11. Potential repetition; consider revision. OE/KL |
---|
64 | 12. Fix figure (bright colours); fix caption (description) WS |
---|
65 | 13. Answer question in cover letter. WS/JPar |
---|
66 | 14. It can; update text, address in cover letter. JPar/KL |
---|
67 | 15. Add sentence with requested information. JPa/JPar |
---|
68 | 16. Add comment in caption. HTL |
---|
69 | 17. Address in text? Also, push back in cover letter. GS/AP |
---|
70 | |
---|
71 | Notes from comments: |
---|
72 | -------------------- |
---|
73 | 1. Take issue with the characterisation that this is not KL |
---|
74 | science (!) in cover letter. |
---|
75 | 2. Push back on reproducibility in cover letter. WS/JPa/KL |
---|
76 | |
---|
77 | |
---|
78 | Push back on Q6; Would like to point Gabor lens and acceleration --> unique. |
---|
79 | |
---|
80 | -------- -------- // -------- -------- |
---|
81 | |
---|
82 | Calorimeters at NPL for dose; Tony Price. |
---|