Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of Research/DesignStudy/Meetings/2018-10-16-LARA

Timestamp:

Oct 16, 2018, 3:55:12 PM (6 years ago)

Author:

longkr

Comment:

--

Research/DesignStudy/Meetings/2018-10-16-LARA

@@ -25 +25 @@
 == Notes: ==
 
-'''Present:''' 
+'''Present:''' JPo, GB, VB, CH, KL, AK, OE, JPa
 
 1. Introduction and status of preparation of 'reference' proposal: **//KL//**
+ * Updated reference proposal still needs to be revised.  This will be completed and posted for reference.
+ * Goal for this meeting is to assess and agree the end-station specification and then re-evaluate the next steps.
 1. End-station siultation update: **//AK, HT//**
+ * Drawing of elements of end-station that intercept the beam [raw-attachment:mkbakffhgnpofblm.png here].  We discussed and **//agreed//**:
+  * 50micron milar for beam vacuum window (perhaps consider 50/75 micron); use MedAustron preferred cell holder; take 2mm thickness for now.
+  * GB will make calculation and practical test of vacuum windows of various thicknesses.  Need a soak test.
+  * AK will bring sample holders to Imperial so that the base thickness can be measured.
+ * **//Agreed//** that the parameter table, especially energy lost in the end-station, will be updated by the end of the week.
 1. Implications and next steps:  **//All//**
+ * With the parameter table revised, next week we agree how to work towards a CDR.  JPa explained that he believes the CDR should be based on the 'Hunt scheme' combined with electrostatic bends.
 1. AoB
+ * Structure of AK's talk ([raw-attachment:AjitKurup-CCAP.pdf.pptx here]) was discussed, much feedback was given(!).