| 10 | |
| 11 | == Actions == |
| 12 | |
| 13 | == Notes == |
| 14 | Present: Andy Goulden, Clive Hill, Ta-Jen Kuo, Ajit Kurup, Jaroslaw Pasternak, Matt Pereira, Rehanah Razak, Will Shields, Anna Vikhoreva, Colin Whyte \\ |
| 15 | Apologies: Ken Long, Hywel Owen |
| 16 | |
| 17 | * Simulations |
| 18 | * Update from WS: |
| 19 | * stage 1 injection line optimisation with space charge to achieve required injection conditions. |
| 20 | * Gabor lens in BDSIM. |
| 21 | * Physical geometry elements are in place. |
| 22 | * Need to add fields. |
| 23 | * JP: Details from CH on diagnostics and correctors to be added to the optics simulation. |
| 24 | * TJK: |
| 25 | * Power calculation after gap height reduction. |
| 26 | * Currents have not been optimised but have come down by about half. |
| 27 | * Still over the limit. |
| 28 | * AG: About 35% of the power is needed for cooling so total power requirement would be of the order of 4 MW. |
| 29 | * CH: FETS substation is only about 1.25MW |
| 30 | * Longitudinal phase space. |
| 31 | * AK to look into this. |
| 32 | * CW: reminder re upcoming milestone and report. |
| 33 | * CH: |
| 34 | * Emailed Bradley Kirk and got CAD model for the FETS FFA RF cavity. Also got some details on beam diagnostics. |
| 35 | * Would like clarification on what level of detail needs to go in the report. |
| 36 | * CW: Deliver the concept and a plan for the FFA but not an engineered solution. |
| 37 | * Discussion on what detail should into the FFA part of the report. |
| 38 | * Agreed to write up what has been done and where the design is now. Focus is on stage 1. |
| 39 | * Discussion re what deliverables should go into the bridging funds request. |
| 40 | * Engineering - CH |
| 41 | * Update on coil layout in CAD. |
| 42 | * 10 nested coils with terminations. |
| 43 | * Expectation is that the assembly is potted. |
| 44 | * CW: Plenty of detail already done and it might be useful to talk to a manufacturer at this point to see what they think. |