| | 10 | |
| | 11 | == Actions == |
| | 12 | |
| | 13 | == Notes == |
| | 14 | Present: Clive Hill, Ta-Jen Kuo, Ajit Kurup, Ken Long, Jaroslaw Pasternak, Matt Pereira, Rehanah Razak, Will Shields, Colin Whyte \\ |
| | 15 | Apologies: Andy Goulden, Hywel Owen |
| | 16 | |
| | 17 | * Simulation |
| | 18 | * Slides from WS: |
| | 19 | * Stage 1 optimisation. Now have a beam (with smaller beta and alpha close to 0) that can get through the injection line and match to the injection conditions. |
| | 20 | * Gabor lens model in BDSim. |
| | 21 | * Geometry details done. |
| | 22 | * EM Field |
| | 23 | * electric field only. |
| | 24 | * Solenoid field is more complicated to implement. |
| | 25 | * TJK: Will work on optimisation so that the field produced by the trim coils add to the field of the main coil. |
| | 26 | * Looking at checking JB's code Fixed Field. |
| | 27 | * Slides from JP: |
| | 28 | * Including correctors and beam profile monitors in the injection line. |
| | 29 | * Assumptions for the gap calculation. |
| | 30 | * This will give the good field region needed and then can do the magnet simulation. |
| | 31 | * Discussion on the gap size. |
| | 32 | * TJK concerned about the dB/B requirement. |
| | 33 | |
| | 34 | * Engineering |
| | 35 | * Template for the documents for milestones 6 and 7. |
| | 36 | * Power requirements for the magnets. |
| | 37 | * Discussion on power requirements for the FETS FFA magnet and comparison with LhARA. |
| | 38 | |
| | 39 | * AOB |
| | 40 | * KL: How is the JAI work is going? |
| | 41 | * MP: Looking at the conceptual design of stage 1 beam delivery in the end station. Lattice design and spot sizes and looking at different magnet options. To be presented in about 5 weeks. |
| | 42 | |
| | 43 | |
